Skip to main content

THE STATE OF CASK part 3: The Selling Point of Point of Sale






In what has become one of the most written about subjects amongst beer communicators for a long while I am going to follow on with my own thoughts about cask beer. Yet these ideas are formulated from potential posts I've been writing the odd paragraph about for around 18 months but never managed to construct into something relevant. 

I have much to say on the subject; so much so that rather than making this into one enormous read I've split it into three sections regarding the current trends and effects on cask beer as I see it. 

Today I look at what retailers can do with cask beer

Part 1 can be read here

Part 2 - here


Away from the town centre, under the subway that tunnels beneath Huddersfield’s ring-road and opposite odd circular brick towers, lays a pub that's interior seems born from an odd Jim Henson and Terry Pratchett collaboration.

The walls are aligned with witches, puppets, nudes and odd creature busts possibly slain from Far Uberwald. Yet the truly remarkable foreign spectacle here lies on the current blackboards and the bar itself.

An old fashioned two room establishment- with separate door to each room at the entrance - the Grove, Huddersfield is still quintessentially a British pub. But the rectangular bar, with serving capability in each room, holds a choice of up to 19 cask beers and 15 keg beers at any one time (as seen on the above image taken on Friday 6th January) as well as a huge array of bottles in the fridges and cellar. It has been providing one of the biggest selections I've ever happened upon in this country for as long as I've been legally around to drink and beyond. It knows its capabilities, its limiations and, most importantly, its sustainability.

How can this be?

The Good Beer Guide days of Cask


The problem with cask beer is that it has an excuse. It often isn't very good. Certainly in suburbia, away from the city centre blog focused area, cask beer is to be approached with cautiousness at all times. There's a rather probable chance that it isn't going to be exactly servable and that you're going to drink it anyway.

It comes into one of those endearing and characteristically British acceptance terms of anything slightly better than diabolical will do. Cask beer has, over the years, normalised statements such as "I bobbed in x pub on the corner at the weekend. It's got four casks on. They weren't that bad actually."
They weren't that bad. This is acceptable. This is cause for celebration. This became the norm. This is a way to form a new local, receive a Pub of the Season award and put money behind the bar. The pub has managed to make a Theakston's XB or a Wychwood Dog's Bollocks taste slightly better than regurgitated bog water so it will do.

It's the perfect excuse for those wanting to leave the cask game to use. The Point of Sale of many cask beers is poor and the brewer has no control over that. Rather than have their product sold in sub-standard condition on the market breweries are just removing the possibility of it going wrong altogether.

The problem in correlation to the likes of Cloudwater Brew Co and Buxton Brewery giving up cask is that I do not believe their beer was entering pubs who would treat their product poorly. Pubs and bars that wanted these breweries represented on their bars generally have some passion and commitment to serving the beer in its best form. Whilst it’s not always perfect, they are far from the suburban brewery-tied establishments frequently encountered and struggling to nail the taste of Jenning's Cumberland Ale.

It’s your fault, landlord..


Still, that isn't to say it will be perfect every time which shows that more knowledge on the treatment and serving of cask is required somewhere.

First, there can be no stubbornness shown from whoever is in charge. When I mentioned in passing to the manager of my local that a well-established cask "craft" beer had been a little hit and miss on its last three appearances on the bar, she was mortified. She didn't blame the brewery, like I was doing, and instead assumed it was a cellaring problem. Cue an inquest and further training for those in the cellar to be sure that the problem wasn't their end. There was no defiance that they were blameless even though I never suggested it.

Second comes understanding of the behaviour of different beers, which may require input from the brewer. I mentioned in Part Two about the Exchange Extraction Stalybridge Buffet Bar implements when tapping and venting Timothy Taylor's Landlord. Aside from this, the beer is racked and rested for a day longer. There's something to do with different pegs being used I'm not entirely clear on myself, yet the point is they serve Landlord perfectly because they know the beer well. Surely then, there are plenty of other casks that need that extra day or just a little extra TLC at cellar stage. Is it for the brewer's to give a little more knowledge and input on the behaviour of their beers before they are presented?

 

This was never about your lust to get hammered on the cheap.


Most recent discussions on cask have been filled with opinionated nonsense and hot-air (you're one to talk, Mark.) But if we learnt anything from 2016, you don't need opinions based on facts or to listen to any sense of reason to drum up a following. You can have a wild thought formed on single minded stubborness and still stand firmly by it, whilst the world burns around you. Hey, isn't that the stance people have seen from a famous beer organisation for a while?

That is why this sort of promotion of cheap drinks is both confusing and meaningless.



Of course people will probably point out Old Mudgie's fondness for hectoring. He is one of those very necessary bloggers I seem to either strongly agree with or strongly disagree with at about a 50/50 split. The problem is this focus that people on tight budgets can still get cheap pints and that’s how it should be, as the blogger that took the picture has also firmly stood by. That’s fine. That in no way has a place in any part of the discussion that has been occurring the past week. This isn’t about whether people can still get multi-national shit in shit dives for pocket money. This is about breweries that spend £65 producing a quality cask of beer being able to sell that beer for more than £65.

For what it’s worth, the place pictured is in Ashton-Under-Lyne; a place and town I know well. I do not consider myself to be exaggerating or being offensive when I say that if you are happy to drink dirt at Oliver’s Bar in Ashton to save pennies then you are LITERALLY happy to drink canal water under a bridge with escaped prisoners. All to save pence..This has no place in this discussion.

 

Controlling the Price


Whilst discussion of fairness of cost has made up much of the past week's discussion, the division in opinion has struggled to think of a way to compromise on the situation. It is entirely unreasonable to plant your feet and say you will never pay above a certain amount for a pint of beer. It is just as unreasonable to announce that from now on all beer will be at least £4.60 a pint and expect people to be happy with the leap.

If beer is going to be priced based on its cost – as it would be in any market - then the onus must move to the pubs to decide the next course of action. That isn't impossible. As a retailer you have control here.

When my local was informed of an increase in the cost of Magic Rock Brewing's casks the original outcry from those doing the purchasing was negative. "They've priced themselves out of this pub" was the general line and the chances of seeing one of my favourite breweries on the bar again seemed over.

But as the anger subsided and, most importantly, the purchaser changed, the attitude to this situation changed. They wanted Magic Rock cask on the bar as much as the punters and I. A strategy would have to be put in place

The solution was to compromise on price. Magic Rock was suddenly coming in at £4.00 a pint - a price that most regulars would baulk at. So when other guest beers were coming in at a potential £2.80 a pint, the pub would subsidise and put these at £3.00 flat a pint with no notice at all. Two casks priced here allowed Magic Rock to be reduced to £3.60 a pint; a much more reasonable sounding offer psychologically. It was still expensive for this pub but closer to the top end price most will pay in this place.

Per beer the pub was making the exact same profit margin. As the price was only increased slightly on newer beers they were not ripping the customer off. There isn't an argument of other drinkers subsidising expensive beers. Others aren’t privy to whether pubs are regularly slapping a bit of extra profit on any pint they sell anyway.

This was about a pub altering a pricing system so that it can still offer its custom the same quality beers it is used to whilst dealing with price increases. I see this as a decent future compromise. There will always be beers available at the lower price so why can’t both live side by side on the bar?


The polymath pub


The problem with the current British beer scene is that people are trying to change its identity – right at a time when it deserves to retain its own. We are not the music scene of the year 2000, when Richard Blackwood was trying to become a rapper at a time when Nas was writing Stillmatic and Dre had dropped 2001. A time when Brits never “broke” America because our music was so poor comparatively. Now we dominate the Grammys and others are envious because we have our own identity and quality.

Cloudwater Brew Co have had one too many trips stateside that have resulted in a lust for the other side of the ocean. It started off as influence and is ending with Being John Malkovich.

I enjoy other beer cultures as much as the next drinker, When I’m in Belgium, receiving table service in a stone-walled waterside bar, it feels like being in Belgium. I am aware I am soaking up and enjoying a different drinking culture. Heck, that is what I wanted from my trip in the first place. When I come home I want an English pub. If somebody has a pub development idea based on a simple influence they've seen abroad then that’s fine - but it doesn't mean an entire change in drinking culture,

Rather than people justifying British business changes based on what they’ve seen on the American market, I suggest everybody takes a trip to Huddersfield and spends an evening in The Grove. Peruse the board there. Soak in the British pub atmosphere. Question how they manage to keep 19 ever changing cask beers in perfect condition. Ask how they manage it when so many pubs can’t get one or two right. Take your influence from there and bring that back with you; a pub in a Yorkshire town that has been successfully selling every type of beer served in every form for years, with only talk of more expansion to come. A pub where cask and keg sit perfectly together and are heralded together. It can work. It does work. So before you poo-poo keg or give up cask altogether, take your influence from the successful places around you.

The future of British beer culture is the responsibility of the producer, the retailer and the consumer. We don’t want a widening divide between two very stubborn sides. I’ll sit on this fence forever believing I can bring everybody together. If the future is about comprmise and understanding then don’t be the person without those virtues. 

But it’s only beer after all...



 

Comments

Benjamin Nunn said…
An excellent, thought-provoking series of articles. Raises more questions than it answers, which is probably as it should be.

My thoughts on the issue here: http://benviveur.blogspot.co.uk/2017/01/chucking-my-two-cents-on-cask-in-crisis.html
Curmudgeon said…
So Carling, the best-selling beer in the UK, is "multi-national shit" and anyone who wants to drink it at a keen price is on a par with people who drink canal water?

You don't think you're coming across as a teeny bit snobbish there?

And cost is only one factor that goes into pricing, as anyone who knows anything about retail businesses knows. You also have to take into account what people perceive as reasonable, and what they are actually prepared to pay. In the average pub, different products will have widely varying profit margins. For example, the margin on soft drinks is normally far greater than that on beer, because the price of soft drinks does not generally affect the decision as to which pub to visit.
Mark Johnson said…
Thanks for the link. First time I've read it. Good stuff. Its a subject that needs as much commentary as possible for me.
Mark Johnson said…
If Carling is your beer of choice then I would assume that you enjoy drinking it in an enjoyable environment. Good price is a pleasing bonus, though can sometimes be an influencing factor. However, if it is the ONLY factor – as in the example of the truly terrible Oliver’s Bar – then yes that is akin to drinking canal water. It is a case of getting beer into your system as cheaply as possible. It is one step away from skulling White Lightning at home.

That isn’t snobbish but it is ridiculously stubborn to continue this promotion of cheap beer amongst the debate on cask beer. There’s a discussion going on and you can’t see past one element of it. I’m not even going to rise to the “retail businesses” jibe as that is just classic Mudgie hectoring. I believe in today’s world that would be considered “trolling.”
Anonymous said…
Black Label. A dumbed down Canadian beer. Produced by Molson Coors. A multi-national beer conglomerate.

A beer that owes its "best-selling" tag nor do much on quality as on the massive advertising spend and reach / market penetration of the largest pub owning brewery of the pre "Beer Orders" era. Bass.

Replacing the words "dumbed down" with "shit", I'm struggling to argue with Mark's point to be fair.
Curmudgeon said…
I would refer you to this blogpost from 2009.

"It has been said that all the advertising in the world will only sell a bad product once, and if people are repeat purchasers of kegs and lagers then obviously they must satisfy their requirements – which will not be the same as the requirements of a beer enthusiast."
Unknown said…
Star Wars (original)... The Lord of the Rings... Back to the Future and now these three.. Superb trilogy of blog posts, hands down my favourite posts you have wrote and the best words wrote on this subject I have read by a country mile. Nice one.. Now I must go add The Grove to my "to-do" list!

Popular posts from this blog

Children and Dogs in Pubs and Bars

  I once took my niece to the pub. She was either 1 or 2 years of age. I often looked after her on Saturdays and on one of our weekly walks, for the first time, I stopped by the local pub, mainly because my friend was there with his daughter of similar age. The two kids got on well together and it was a lovely couple of hours; a perfect showcase of adult friends and their children existing in public houses. But my sister was furious. She didn’t rant or rave but her lips were purser than a 90s children’s show teacher. It was here that I learned of the effect that our childhood had had upon her. She recalls many an afternoon being bored in the corner of pubs that our Dad had dragged us to, arms folded in the corner with nothing to do, and she doesn’t want the same for her children. The idea of her first born being taken to pubs infuriates her; fearful that they would be subjected to the same unhappy experiences that she was.  I don’t recall those times in the same way as my s

My Life in Guinness - Drink What You Like

      I first obtained my booze “bragging rights” drinking 4 cans of the black stuff at a house party in my mid-teens. Teenage masculinity was judged on one’s ability to put away alcohol in the early noughties. It appears trite and toxic now but, as a 15-year-old, to hear my older brother’s friends say “Well played mate, I couldn’t down that stuff” was the kind of social praise we devoured.   It didn’t occur to me then that twenty years on the same drink would be causing an industry existential crisis. I wasn’t pondering the reasoning behind my drink choice 20 years ago. It was fairly simple: I drank Guinness because I liked the taste. I differed from my friends in that sense, who chose crates of Fosters and Bacardi Breezers for house parties as it was the done thing. At least two of those present at those gatherings would go on to use the common phrase “Let’s be honest – nobody really likes the taste of beer” in their adult life and expect universal agreement.   It

The Ten Pubs That Made Me - Part 3: Dr Okell's / My Foley's Tap House and Leeds

A pint in Mr Foley's Tap House from December 2022     This is Part 3 (the fourth post) of an ongoing project. Please see the beginning of Part 0 for details.    Come the end of this journey, there may be a lesson in procrastination that I am unlikely to heed. These posts stem from a list that I made three years ago and a series that I embarked on 18 months ago. We’ve only now reached a 30% completion rate and with this post we are back to fail for the second time.   This odyssey began with a trip to Mr Foley’s Tap House in February 2022 – named Dr Okell’s bar on my first visits in 2005 – only to discover that it was closed. It did reopen by the time that the post was coming out and I managed a brief visit in December 2022. However, my July 1 st 2023 trip to Leeds, on which this post is based, is met with this sign at the door of the bar:      A quick check of social media shows an Instagram post from the day before (June 30 th ) announcing the closure of the