Skip to main content



A couple of discussions seemed to have passed me by in the last couple of weeks and, when I did eventually pick up on them, roused some interest upon reading. The first was an article by Glynn Davis for Beer Insider, the second was a Hopinions podcast Twitter poll and the resulting audio show. 

Both referred to the discussion of whether a half pint should be half the price of a full pint. Whilst the results of the Twitter poll at least were fairly one sided, there were still discussions justifying any difference in pricing; areas where half a pint may be more than a full pint because there is some sort of strenuous extra labour involved in its production. With this I have discovered new types of bars that have interesting pay structures.

The argument seems to be that the labour costs are the same for serving a half as they are a pint and that must be reflected in the price one pays. Therefore, there are areas in the country where people either are or believed to be working in one of the following two ways:

1)      The bar staff are paid commission on every drink served; a pay by play basis if you will. Each drink, whatever it is, forms the wages of the staff and therefore they must be factored in as such. Presumably they are just standing around waiting for customers and do not get paid if nobody comes in.

2)      Serving drinks at the bar is a huge inconvenience and additional service provided by bar staff that is beyond their original contracts. Each drink must be charged per pour because it is not expected of them.

I’m intrigued by these bars as I’ve never been in one. Those that I have been around work out their beer prices based on a GP for all beer that at a bare minimum will cover the overheads of the business as well as turn a profit. Overheads usually include things like electricity, rent, business rates, wages, maintenance and... wait, that’s right – wages. Wages are included in the overheads. Wages have already been factored into the beer prices - as has the use of the glass washer, glass expense and wear and tear on the beer engines. This is already included in the price of your pint or any other measure that you choose.

So there is no “extra” cost for pulling a half over a pint. There is no comparable difference in the work involved that needs to be factored in. That has already been paid for.

If bars are adamant that there are further unaccounted costs in pulling a half pint over a pint then I encourage them to base their GDP on a half pint and double it.

Further counter points are that this is a discount for added quantity, like one may see elsewhere, but beer down the pub is not advertising space or a carton of milk. Not everything in the world is priced the same. If this was the case then it would be commonplace to see 6 pints for £20 offers as well (and yes I am aware such nonsense exists in student bars and Yates.)

The reason it is not comparable to the likes of milk is because the overheads are projected in the original price. It is not:
 £5.00 a pint + £50p service charge = £5.50 a pint 
THEREFORE £2.50 a half + 50p service charge = £3.00 a half. 

However, the likes of milk are calculated in such a way: 
A pint carton = 30p worth of liquid + 30p packaging and labour. 60p overall. 
A 2pint carton = 60p worth of liquid + 40p packaging and labour. £1.00 overall.

The only counter arguments can be that it “has always been this way” so we are following some dormant tradition. Or perhaps they are looking to the continent where uneven pricing for “small” and “large” measures is common, though this doesn’t adhere to our stricter measurement acts.

If any pubs or bars want to have a specific pricing structure that increases price for smaller measures then they have every right to do so. I'm also not bothered by the odd 10p here and there. This is not a flat out criticism of those structures. 

It is criticism of the outright lie that this can be attributed as an extra service charge because wages are not already pitched as overheads. Do not continue this folly that we are paying service charges for pouring beer. It is insulting nonsense. The beer pulled at your pub is different to that sold packaged in your local supermarket. It is also very different to the meat at your butcher’s, the cost of travel insurance or a new three piece suite. Those things do cost money and are priced in a certain way. But to almost coin a popular phrase – what the hell has that got to do with the price of a half? 


Popular posts from this blog

Children and Dogs in Pubs and Bars

  I once took my niece to the pub. She was either 1 or 2 years of age. I often looked after her on Saturdays and on one of our weekly walks, for the first time, I stopped by the local pub, mainly because my friend was there with his daughter of similar age. The two kids got on well together and it was a lovely couple of hours; a perfect showcase of adult friends and their children existing in public houses. But my sister was furious. She didn’t rant or rave but her lips were purser than a 90s children’s show teacher. It was here that I learned of the effect that our childhood had had upon her. She recalls many an afternoon being bored in the corner of pubs that our Dad had dragged us to, arms folded in the corner with nothing to do, and she doesn’t want the same for her children. The idea of her first born being taken to pubs infuriates her; fearful that they would be subjected to the same unhappy experiences that she was.  I don’t recall those times in the same way as my s

My Life in Guinness - Drink What You Like

      I first obtained my booze “bragging rights” drinking 4 cans of the black stuff at a house party in my mid-teens. Teenage masculinity was judged on one’s ability to put away alcohol in the early noughties. It appears trite and toxic now but, as a 15-year-old, to hear my older brother’s friends say “Well played mate, I couldn’t down that stuff” was the kind of social praise we devoured.   It didn’t occur to me then that twenty years on the same drink would be causing an industry existential crisis. I wasn’t pondering the reasoning behind my drink choice 20 years ago. It was fairly simple: I drank Guinness because I liked the taste. I differed from my friends in that sense, who chose crates of Fosters and Bacardi Breezers for house parties as it was the done thing. At least two of those present at those gatherings would go on to use the common phrase “Let’s be honest – nobody really likes the taste of beer” in their adult life and expect universal agreement.   It

The Ten Pubs That Made Me - Part 3: Dr Okell's / My Foley's Tap House and Leeds

A pint in Mr Foley's Tap House from December 2022     This is Part 3 (the fourth post) of an ongoing project. Please see the beginning of Part 0 for details.    Come the end of this journey, there may be a lesson in procrastination that I am unlikely to heed. These posts stem from a list that I made three years ago and a series that I embarked on 18 months ago. We’ve only now reached a 30% completion rate and with this post we are back to fail for the second time.   This odyssey began with a trip to Mr Foley’s Tap House in February 2022 – named Dr Okell’s bar on my first visits in 2005 – only to discover that it was closed. It did reopen by the time that the post was coming out and I managed a brief visit in December 2022. However, my July 1 st 2023 trip to Leeds, on which this post is based, is met with this sign at the door of the bar:      A quick check of social media shows an Instagram post from the day before (June 30 th ) announcing the closure of the